Swinging for the Fences: Strategic Risk Taking in Entrepreneurship

James Ostler

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business

October 5, 2012

Traditional entrepreneurship research holds that a role of entrepreneurs is to bear risk and that entrepreneurs are risk seeking, or at least less risk averse than others. Using a tournament model we show that, due to competitive effects, even risk-neutral entrepreneurs appear to be risk seeking and will take on significant levels of risk. To explain this we introduce the concept of strategic risk, which we define as rational risk taking that arises due to competition. We show that the traditional view may have it backwards: we do not observe risky behavior because entrepreneurs have a taste for risk, but rather the structure of some markets induces rational strategic risk taking, and it is the presence of risk and uncertainty that allows entrepreneurship to exist. The model predicts that industries with higher uncertainty and riskier strategies available to entrepreneurs will have higher levels of entrepreneurial entry. We offer an alternative explanation to why radical innovations disproportionately come from small entrepreneurial firms, and why certain industries are more innovative than others.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Risk-Taking

JEL Classification: D21, C70, M13, L10, O30

Not Available For Download

Date posted: May 26, 2011 ; Last revised: October 29, 2014

Suggested Citation

Ostler, James, Swinging for the Fences: Strategic Risk Taking in Entrepreneurship (October 5, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1850943 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1850943

Contact Information

James Ostler (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )
405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States
University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business ( email )
701 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI MI 48109
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,346
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.141 seconds