Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1853773
 
 

Footnotes (264)



 


 



Transnational Class Actions and the Illusory Search for Res Judicata


Tanya J. Monestier


Roger Williams University School of Law

May 26, 2011

Tulane Law Review, Vol. 86, p. 1, 2011
Roger Williams Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 105

Abstract:     
The transnational class action – a class action in which a portion of the class consists of non-U.S. claimants – is here to stay. Defendants typically resist the certification of transnational class actions on the basis that such actions provide no assurance of finality for a defendant, as it will always be possible for a non-U.S. class member to initiate subsequent proceedings in a foreign court. In response to this concern, many U.S. courts will analyze whether the “home” courts of the foreign class members would accord res judicata effect to an eventual U.S. judgment prior to certifying a U.S. class action containing foreign class members. The more likely the foreign court is to recognize a U.S. class judgment, the more likely that an American court will include those foreigners in the U.S. class action.

Current scholarship accepts propriety of the res judicata analysis, but questions the manner in which the analysis is carried out. This Article breaks from the existing literature by arguing that the dynamics of class litigation render the res judicata effect of an eventual U.S. class judgment inherently unknowable to a U.S. court ex ante. In particular, I argue that certain “litigation dynamics” – specifically the process of proving foreign law via experts, the principle of party prosecution, and the litigation posture of the action – complicate the transnational class action landscape and prevent a court from accurately analyzing the res judicata issues at play. This is exacerbated by the “structural dynamics” of class litigation: the complexity of foreign law on the recognition and enforcement of judgments; the newness of class action law in most foreign countries; and the distinction between general and fact-specific grounds for non-enforcement of a U.S. class judgment. Accordingly, I argue that U.S. courts should abandon their illusory search for res judicata. Instead, courts should avoid the res judicata problem altogether by employing an opt-in mechanism for foreign class plaintiffs, whereby such plaintiffs are not bound unless they affirmatively undertake to be bound by U.S. class judgment. An opt-in mechanism for foreign plaintiffs also provides several advantages over the current opt-out mechanism: it allows all foreign claimants to participate in U.S. litigation if they so choose; it provides additional protections for absent foreign claimants; it respects international comity; and it sufficiently deters defendant misconduct.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 80

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 29, 2011 ; Last revised: January 17, 2014

Suggested Citation

Monestier, Tanya J., Transnational Class Actions and the Illusory Search for Res Judicata (May 26, 2011). Tulane Law Review, Vol. 86, p. 1, 2011 ; Roger Williams Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 105. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1853773

Contact Information

Tanya J. Monestier (Contact Author)
Roger Williams University School of Law ( email )
10 Metacom Avenue
Bristol, RI 02809
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 937
Downloads: 217
Download Rank: 81,175
Footnotes:  264

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds