Another Example from the Proposed New Federal Rules of Evidence
Thomas M. Cooley Law School
September 1, 2009
Michigan Bar Journal, Vol. 88, p. 46, September 2009
The second of four articles comparing an example from the Federal Rules of Evidence with the "restyled" version. After summarizing why most legal drafting has been so bad for so long, the article identifies 31 drafting deficiencies in Rule 612. The new rules are scheduled to take effect in December 2011.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 3
Keywords: Legal Writing, Legal Drafting, Drafting, Federal Rules of Evidence, Restyled Federal Rules of Evidence
JEL Classification: K10, K30, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 31, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.406 seconds