Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1854702
 


 



Another Example from the Proposed New Federal Rules of Evidence


Joseph Kimble


Thomas M. Cooley Law School

September 1, 2009

Michigan Bar Journal, Vol. 88, p. 46, September 2009

Abstract:     
The second of four articles comparing an example from the Federal Rules of Evidence with the "restyled" version. After summarizing why most legal drafting has been so bad for so long, the article identifies 31 drafting deficiencies in Rule 612. The new rules are scheduled to take effect in December 2011.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Keywords: Legal Writing, Legal Drafting, Drafting, Federal Rules of Evidence, Restyled Federal Rules of Evidence

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 31, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Kimble, Joseph, Another Example from the Proposed New Federal Rules of Evidence (September 1, 2009). Michigan Bar Journal, Vol. 88, p. 46, September 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1854702

Contact Information

Joseph Kimble (Contact Author)
Thomas M. Cooley Law School ( email )
300 S. Capitol Avenue
P.O. Box 13038
Lansing, MI 48901
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 106
Downloads: 10

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.406 seconds