Baehr v. Lewin and the Long Road to Marriage Equality
Michael D. Sant'Ambrogio
Michigan State University - College of Law
Sylvia Ann Law
New York University School of Law
May 28, 2011
University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol. 33, 2011
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-37
In 1993, the Hawai‘i Supreme Court held in Baehr v. Lewin that excluding same-sex couples from marriage was presumptively invalid under the Hawai‘i Constitution because it discriminated on the basis of sex. Consequently, the exclusion could only be upheld if the State could demonstrate that it “furthers compelling state interests and is narrowly drawn to avoid unnecessary abridgments of constitutional rights.” This decision marked the first victory in the marriage equality movement in America.
Baehr and its progeny have generated an important debate in legal and social science literature about whether “early” civil rights victories are incremental steps forward or precipitate a damaging backlash. The paper argues that, on balance, Baehr was an important step forward for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights and gender equality. By asking the State to explain why same-sex couples could not be married, the Hawai‘i Supreme Court opened a dialogue that continues to this day.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 29, 2011 ; Last revised: June 30, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds