Fair Value and Audit Fees
Lancaster University - Department of Accounting and Finance
Edward J. Riedl
Boston University - Questrom School of Business
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU) Munich
September 5, 2012
Review of Accounting Studies, Forthcoming
This paper investigates the effect of fair value reporting and its attributes on audit fees. We use as our primary sample the European real estate industry around mandatory IFRS adoption (under which reporting of property fair values becomes compulsory), due to its unique operating and reporting characteristics. We document lower audit fees for firms reporting property assets at fair value relative to those employing depreciated cost ― a difference that appears driven (in part) by impairment tests that occur only under depreciated cost. We further find that audit fees are decreasing in firm’s exposure to fair value, and increasing both in the complexity of the fair value estimation and for recognition (versus only disclosure) of fair values. We corroborate our findings in two alternative settings: contrasting UK and US real estate firms; and using UK investment trusts. Overall, the results suggest that fair values can lead to lower monitoring costs; however, any reductions in audit fees will vary with salient characteristics of the fair value reporting, including the difficulty to measure and the treatment within the financial statements.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: fair value, audit fees, audit pricing, real estate industry, IFRS
JEL Classification: M41, M42
Date posted: June 3, 2011 ; Last revised: September 5, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds