Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1856702
 
 

References (43)



 
 

Citations (5)



 


 



Understanding Process Tracing


David Collier


University of California, Berkeley - Department of Political Science

June 1, 2011

PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 823-830, October 2011

Abstract:     
Process tracing is a fundamental method of qualitative analysis. While it is often invoked by scholars as they examine qualitative data, too frequently this tool is neither adequately understood nor rigorously applied. This deficit motivates the present article, which offers a new framework for carrying out process tracing. This reformulation integrates discussions of process tracing and causal-process observations, gives greater attention to description as a key contribution, and emphasizes the causal sequence in which process-tracing observations can be situated. In the current period of major innovation in quantitative tools for causal inference, this reformulation is part of a wider, parallel effort to achieve greater systematization of qualitative methods. A key point here is that these methods can add inferential leverage too often lacking in quantitative analysis. The presentation is accompanied by teaching exercises, which focus on three examples from international relations, one from American politics, two from comparative politics, and one from public health/epidemiology.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 3, 2011 ; Last revised: October 18, 2011

Suggested Citation

Collier, David, Understanding Process Tracing (June 1, 2011). PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 823-830, October 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1856702

Contact Information

David Collier (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - Department of Political Science ( email )
210 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,112
Downloads: 660
Download Rank: 20,896
References:  43
Citations:  5

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.484 seconds