Footnotes (101)



The Vonage Trilogy: A Case Study in 'Patent Bullying'

Ted M. Sichelman

University of San Diego School of Law

December 15, 2014

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 543-577, 2014

This Article presents an in-depth case study of a series of infringement suits filed by “patent bullies.” Unlike the oft-discussed “patent trolls” — which typically sell no products or services and perform no R & D — patent bullies are large, established operating companies that threaten or institute costly patent infringement actions of dubious merit against smaller companies, usually in order to suppress competition or garner licensing fees. In an ideal world of high-quality patents and optimal patent licensing and litigation, infringement suits by aggressive incumbents would have a cleansing, almost Darwinian effect. Yet, defects and distortions in patent examination, licensing, and litigation — the very problems that are raised constantly in the context of patent trolls — generally apply with equal and, often, greater force to patent bullies. Nonetheless, patent bullies have scarcely been discussed in the academic literature or popular press, especially in recent years.

More specifically, this Article examines three patent infringement suits filed by incumbent telecommunications carriers — Sprint, Verizon, and AT&T — against Vonage, then an early-stage company providing consumer telephone services over the Internet. Based on a detailed analysis of the patents-at-issue, prior art, court documents, and news accounts, it shows that the incumbents were able to exploit defects in the patent system in order to prevent disruptive technologies from competing with their outmoded products and services. Because startups like Vonage typically lack the resources to vigorously defend against even weak patent suits, patent bullying can result in severe anti-competitive effects. The incumbents in the Vonage suits achieved their intended result — drastically reducing Vonage’s stock price, severely weakening its position in the market, and placing it at the brink of insolvency. This case study demonstrates that further theoretical and empirical study is warranted to assess the full extent of the patent bullying problem.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Patents, Vonage, VoIP, Patent Bullies, Telecommunications

JEL Classification: K2, O3, O34

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 4, 2011 ; Last revised: February 26, 2015

Suggested Citation

Sichelman, Ted M., The Vonage Trilogy: A Case Study in 'Patent Bullying' (December 15, 2014). Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 543-577, 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1856703 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1856703

Contact Information

Ted M. Sichelman (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
(619) 260-7512 (Phone)
(619) 260-2748 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.sandiego.edu/law/academics/faculty/bio.php?id=795
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,131
Downloads: 339
Download Rank: 58,616
Footnotes:  101
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Trolls or Great Inventors: Case Studies of Patent Assertion Entities
By Ryan Holte

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds