Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1857099
 
 

Footnotes (427)



 


 



'A Considerable Surgical Operation': Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts


Kristin A. Collins


Boston University School of Law

November 2, 2010

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 60, No. 2, p. 249, November 2010
Boston University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-23

Abstract:     
This Article examines the history of judge-made law in the federal courts through the lens of the early-nineteenth-century federal courts’ equity powers. In a series of equity cases, and in the Federal Equity Rules promulgated by the Court in 1822 and 1842, the Supreme Court vehemently insisted that lower federal courts employ a uniform corpus of nonstate equity principles with respect to procedure, remedies, and - in certain instances - primary rights and liabilities. Careful attention to the historical sources suggests that the uniform equity doctrine was not simply the product of an overreaching, consolidationist Supreme Court, but is best understood in the context of important and surprisingly underappreciated early-nineteenth-century debates concerning judicial reform. During this period, both Congress and the Court were preoccupied with the disuniformity in the administration of the federal judicial system, especially in the farther reaches of the republic. When reform was not forthcoming through legislation, the Supreme Court achieved a modicum of uniformity in the federal courts through the application of a single body of equity principles drawn from federal and English sources. But the Court did not act unilaterally. Congress’s repeated acquiescence to, and extension of, the Court’s uniform equity doctrine reveals a complex, interbranch dynamic at work. Retelling the story of nonstate, judge-made law in the federal courts through the lens of equity is not intended to demonstrate that such a formulation of federal judicial power was (or is) correct. Rather, by recuperating the history of federal equity power, this Article illuminates the significant metamorphosis of the meaning of Article III’s grant of judicial power. This change has been elided in modern accounts of federal judge-made law in an effort to bolster the legitimacy of a modern vision of federal judicial power.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 96

Keywords: Judge-made law, federal courts’ equity powers, federal courts, Federal Equity Rules of 1822 and 1842, history of federal equity power, Article III, nineteenth century federal courts, 19th century legal history

JEL Classification: K19, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 4, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Collins, Kristin A., 'A Considerable Surgical Operation': Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts (November 2, 2010). Duke Law Journal, Vol. 60, No. 2, p. 249, November 2010; Boston University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-23. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1857099

Contact Information

Kristin A. Collins (Contact Author)
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 626
Downloads: 115
Download Rank: 142,610
Footnotes:  427

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds