Modularity Moderating between Governance and Competence Perspectives: The Effect of Knowledge Interdependence on Firms’ R&D Scope Decisions
Samsung Economic Research Institute
Sebastian K. Fixson
Babson College - Technology, Operations, and Information Management Division; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management
December 22, 2010
Uncertainty has long been understood as a stimulus for firms to manage their boundaries, i.e., to define the scope of their activities. However, two to some extent competing strategy perspectives, governance and competence, predict that firms faced with uncertainty would either increase or decrease their scope of activities, respectively. In an attempt to reconcile these conflicting positions, we propose a model in which the system-level property knowledge interdependence moderates the effect of technological uncertainty on firms. R&D scope decisions. To test our model empirically, we develop a new set of measures for knowledge interdependence and technological uncertainty, and collect 33 years of data (1967-2000) on patenting activity and firm boundary location in the automotive airbag industry. The results of our analysis generally support our model, and show that in case of knowledge-creating activities such as R&D, scope decisions under technological uncertainty are more driven by concerns about co-specialization effects than transaction efficiencies. We discuss implications of these findings for managerial practice and future research.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43
Keywords: Knowledge interdependence, Modularity, Technological Uncertainty, Research and Development, Firm boundary, Complex Technological Products, Industry Emergence
JEL Classification: L22, L62, O31, O32working papers series
Date posted: June 10, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.438 seconds