Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1857889
 
 

Footnotes (334)



 


 



Outsourcing Fraud Detection: The Analyst as Dodd-Frank Whistleblower


Luke R. Hornblower


Loyola Law School Los Angeles; Georgetown University Law Center

July 25, 2011

Journal of Business & Technology Law, Vol. 6, No. 2

Abstract:     
The Dodd-Frank Act ushers in a new era of whistleblower law. Congress, for the first time, is rewarding the providers of “independent analysis” that helps the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) prosecute fraud. To receive a bounty under section 922(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, “independent knowledge” of fraud is not required. While the statute recognizes the importance of securities analysts in identifying violations, the rules interpreting this language fall short in considering and accounting for the costs to whistleblowers in the financial services industry.

This Article first argues that if SEC bounties are intended to compensate whistleblowers, the SEC’s decisions as to the size of the bounty should reflect not only the intrinsic value of the information to the SEC, but also the whistleblower’s cost of providing that information. Specifically, Rule 21F-6, which allows the SEC to consider whistleblower costs in determining the size of the award, should be changed to require the SEC to consider those costs.

Second, this Article considers the recent economic research about whistleblowers and concludes that the SEC cannot afford to discourage hedge fund managers and other buy side analysts from participating in the SEC program. To avoid that outcome, the SEC should allow these actors to “double-dip,” or collect bounties despite profiting on short positions. Finally, the SEC should clarify when “independent analysis” qualifies for a bounty.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 4, 2011 ; Last revised: September 19, 2011

Suggested Citation

Hornblower, Luke R., Outsourcing Fraud Detection: The Analyst as Dodd-Frank Whistleblower (July 25, 2011). Journal of Business & Technology Law, Vol. 6, No. 2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1857889

Contact Information

Luke R. Hornblower (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
Los Angeles, CA
United States
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
Washington, DC 20057
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,738
Downloads: 199
Download Rank: 91,735
Footnotes:  334

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds