Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1859345
 
 

Footnotes (311)



 


 



Administering Marriage: Marriage-Based Entitlements, Bureaucracy, and the Legal Construction of the Family


Kristin A. Collins


Boston University School of Law

June 7, 2011

Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, 2009
Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-25

Abstract:     
Today marriage-based entitlements are considered part and parcel of marriage itself. This was not always the case. Mining hundreds of handwritten administrative records, executive branch reports, and federal statutes, this Article traces the origins of public marriage-based entitlements to an underexamined and surprisingly broad-scale system of early nineteenth-century federal military pensions and land grants that provided financial assistance to tens of thousands of widows. The story of widows’ military subsidies challenges claims to laissez-faire liberalism’s particular hold on the nineteenth century and, as important, evidences the complex mutually constitutive relationship between marriage law and social provision for women. While traditionally marriage had worked to insulate the polity from women’s financial needs by assigning liability for women’s support to husbands and their estates, with the creation of marriage-based entitlements marriage also became a potential doorway to public support. This, in turn, shaped the legal construction of marriage itself. This Article demonstrates how, in an early instance of bureaucratic disentitlement, the administrators charged with adjudicating women’s subsidy claims systematically resisted the capacious conception of marriage used by contemporary courts and narrowed the legal definition of marriage, in part to protect the public purse from women’s claims.

The story of early nineteenth-century marriage-based entitlements provides a critical perspective on the relationship between social provision and marriage more generally. Modern marriage critics emphasize that the liberal state has traditionally deployed the private family as a means of protecting the state from women’s financial needs and has used expansive conceptions of marriage and marriage-like relationships to achieve that end. However, the historical evidence presented in this Article shows that marriage has also long been used as a conduit for public support of significant classes of women. In that context, the state has tended to narrow the definition of marriage - also in order to limit the state’s responsibility for women’s dependency. Ultimately, by providing ample evidence of marriage’s protean qualities, this Article demonstrates how the state has shaped the metes and bounds of marriage and the family at least in part in response to the pressure created by different legal liability rules and systems of social provision. And it has done so while preserving and sustaining the image of marriage’s transhistorical and enduring stability as a socio-legal institution that privatizes women’s dependency.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 84

Keywords: legal history, marrige-based entitlements, nineteenth-century federal military pensions, nineteenth-century land grants, women's dependency

JEL Classification: K11, K12, K19, K39, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 7, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Collins, Kristin A., Administering Marriage: Marriage-Based Entitlements, Bureaucracy, and the Legal Construction of the Family (June 7, 2011). Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, 2009; Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1859345

Contact Information

Kristin A. Collins (Contact Author)
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 557
Downloads: 45
Footnotes:  311

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds