Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1859395
 
 

Footnotes (106)



 


 



Dangerous and Unusual Misdirection: A Look at the Common Law Tradition of Prohibiting Going Armed with Dangerous and Unusual Weapons to the Terror of the People, as Cited in District of Columbia versus Heller


Daniel Richard Page


affiliation not provided to SSRN

May 4, 2011


Abstract:     
In dicta, the Supreme Court in Heller cited the historical ban on “Dangerous and Unusual Weapons” to support a common use test on statutes that ban certain types of weapons considered to be, “dangerous and unusual." This paper examines the historical use and definition of the phrase, “Dangerous and Unusual Weapons,” and concludes that it refers not to a class of weapons, but to a class of behavior.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: dangerous firearms, unusual firearms, firearm, keeping dangerous and unusual weapons, terror of the people, arms, weapons, guns, gun control, weapon, Heller, common use. second amendment, 2nd Amendment, right to bear arms, right to keep and bear arms, affray

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 8, 2011 ; Last revised: June 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Page, Daniel Richard, Dangerous and Unusual Misdirection: A Look at the Common Law Tradition of Prohibiting Going Armed with Dangerous and Unusual Weapons to the Terror of the People, as Cited in District of Columbia versus Heller (May 4, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1859395 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1859395

Contact Information

Daniel Richard Page (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 444
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 141,405
Footnotes:  106

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds