Therasense v. Becton Dickinson: A First Impression
University of Iowa - College of Law
Loyola Law School Los Angeles
June 8, 2011
Yale Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 14, p. 226, 2012
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-38
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-02
This purpose of this essay is to provide an early analysis of some of the most substantial law and policy concerns raised by the very recent en banc decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the now famous Therasense v. Becton Dickinson case. The doctrinal issue central to the case is inequitable conduct, a judicially created doctrine developed to punish patent applicants who behave inappropriately during patent prosecution, the ex parte process of patent creation. The core thesis of this essay is that Therasense could have a much more significant, complex, and nuanced impact on the legal infrastructure of American innovation than the opinion for the court appears to appreciate. In view of these complexities, the court may be too sanguine in its expectations for the instrumental effect of its decision, a decision that holds the potential to erode some of the core pillars upon which the legal infrastructure of American innovation is built.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40
Keywords: Inequitable Conduct, Therasense, Patent Law, Patent Policy, Innovation Policy, Law and Economics, Patent Prosecution, Patent Litigation, Information Costs
Date posted: June 9, 2011 ; Last revised: January 3, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds