Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1859764
 
 

Footnotes (114)



 


 



Therasense v. Becton Dickinson: A First Impression


Jason Rantanen


University of Iowa - College of Law

Lee Petherbridge


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

June 8, 2011

Yale Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 14, p. 226, 2012
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-38
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-02

Abstract:     
This purpose of this essay is to provide an early analysis of some of the most substantial law and policy concerns raised by the very recent en banc decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the now famous Therasense v. Becton Dickinson case. The doctrinal issue central to the case is inequitable conduct, a judicially created doctrine developed to punish patent applicants who behave inappropriately during patent prosecution, the ex parte process of patent creation. The core thesis of this essay is that Therasense could have a much more significant, complex, and nuanced impact on the legal infrastructure of American innovation than the opinion for the court appears to appreciate. In view of these complexities, the court may be too sanguine in its expectations for the instrumental effect of its decision, a decision that holds the potential to erode some of the core pillars upon which the legal infrastructure of American innovation is built.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: Inequitable Conduct, Therasense, Patent Law, Patent Policy, Innovation Policy, Law and Economics, Patent Prosecution, Patent Litigation, Information Costs

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 9, 2011 ; Last revised: July 7, 2012

Suggested Citation

Rantanen, Jason and Petherbridge, Lee, Therasense v. Becton Dickinson: A First Impression (June 8, 2011). Yale Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 14, p. 226, 2012; U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-38; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1859764 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1859764

Contact Information

Jason Rantanen
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
Lee Petherbridge (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-8194 (Phone)
213-380-3769 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,856
Downloads: 2,848
Download Rank: 1,845
Footnotes:  114
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Software Patents and the Return of Functional Claiming
By Mark Lemley

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds