The Fourteenth Amendment and the Unconstitutionality of Secession
Daniel A. Farber
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
July 19, 2012
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1862443
If the Civil War killed secession as a practical matter, the Fourteenth Amendment drove a stake through its heart as a constitutional matter. For Nineteenth Century Americans, citizenship involved both the citizen’s allegiance to the sovereign and the sovereign’s duty to protect the citizen’s rights. Lincoln and other Republicans believed that national citizenship was primary, while Southerners viewed state citizenship as the primary basis for allegiance. The first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment confirms that national citizenship is primary and state citizenship is derivative; the privileges or immunities clause forbids state interference with the relationship between citizens and the federal government; and section 5 confirms congressional power to suppress any such state interference. In short, whatever might have been argued before the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment definitively resolved the secession issue.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: citizenship, Civil War, Fourteenth Amendment, privileges or immunities clause, Reconstruction history
Date posted: June 13, 2011 ; Last revised: July 20, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.969 seconds