Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862670
 
 

Citations (6)



 
 

Footnotes (6)



 


 



Intuitive and Reflective Inferences


Hugo Mercier


University of Neuchatel

Dan Sperber


affiliation not provided to SSRN

June 11, 2008

IN TWO MINDS: DUAL PROCESSES AND BEYOND, Jonathan Evans and Keith Frankish, eds., Oxford University Press, April 2009

Abstract:     
Much evidence has accumulated in favor of such a dual view of reasoning (Evans, 2003, in press; for arguments against, see Osman, 2004). There is however some vagueness in the way the two systems are characterized. Instead of a principled distinction, we are presented with a bundle of contrasting features - slow/fast, automatic/controlled, explicit/implicit, associationist/rule based, modular/central - that, depending on the specific dual process theory, are attributed more or less exclusively to one of the two systems. As Evans states in a recent review, “it would then be helpful to have some clear basis for this distinction”; he also suggests that “we might be better off talking about type 1 and type 2 processes” rather than systems (Evans, in press). We share the intuitions that drove the development of dual system theories. Our goal here is to propose in the same spirit a principled distinction between two types of inferences: ‘intuitive inference’ and ‘reflective inference’ (or reasoning proper). We ground this distinction in a massively modular view of the human mind where metarepresentational modules play an important role in explaining the peculiarities of human psychological evolution. We defend the hypothesis that the main function of reflective inference is to produce and evaluate arguments occurring in interpersonal communication (rather than to help individual ratiocination). This function, we claim, helps explain important aspects of reasoning. We review some of the existing evidence and argue that it gives support to this approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: reasoning, dual process models, intuitive inference, reflective inference

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 12, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan, Intuitive and Reflective Inferences (June 11, 2008). IN TWO MINDS: DUAL PROCESSES AND BEYOND, Jonathan Evans and Keith Frankish, eds., Oxford University Press, April 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862670

Contact Information

Hugo Mercier (Contact Author)
University of Neuchatel ( email )
Espace Louis Agassiz 1
Neuchâtel, 2000
Switzerland
Dan Sperber
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,063
Downloads: 224
Download Rank: 78,960
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  6
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds