References (53)





A Reassessment of the Evidence that Accruals Quality is a Priced Risk Factor

Kai Du

Pennsylvania State University

June 15, 2011

Without a theoretical consensus on how information risk affects expected returns, the two-pass methodology widely used to test whether accruals quality (AQ) is a priced risk factor can easily misinterpret mispricing of AQ as evidence of risk. Building on a simple model of asset pricing tests, I predict and confirm that the AQ factor premium estimated from a misspecified two-pass test is mechanically dependent on the correlation between AQ and AQ factor loading. As a result, existing evidence that AQ factor is priced is in fact driven by the mispricing of AQ characteristic. Consistent with the cross-sectional behavior of mispricing, the return regularity on AQ is stronger for firms with greater information uncertainty and imperfect investor competition. In addition, managers seem to strategically exploit market misvaluation by reporting more one-time items when firms with more volatile discretionary accruals earn a higher premium.

Keywords: accruals quality, two-pass asset pricing test, misspecification, mispricing

Not Available For Download

Date posted: June 16, 2011 ; Last revised: April 14, 2014

Suggested Citation

Du, Kai, A Reassessment of the Evidence that Accruals Quality is a Priced Risk Factor (June 15, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1865037 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1865037

Contact Information

Kai Du (Contact Author)
Pennsylvania State University ( email )
306 Business Building
University Park, PA 16801
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 881

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.172 seconds