Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1865918
 
 

Footnotes (211)



 


 



(Mis)Judging Intent: The Fundamental Attribution Error in Federal Securities Law


Victor D. Quintanilla


Indiana University Maurer School of Law

2010

NYU Journal of Business & Law, Vol. 7, pp. 195-246, 2010

Abstract:     
This article examines the element of scienter (fraudulent intent) in claims of federal securities fraud under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and, more specifically, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007) from a social psychological perspective. The field of social psychology has documented a pervasive phenomena, the Fundamental Attribution Error, the failure of decision makers to consider situational explanations, including the force of environments and social and situational norms on human conduct. In light of robust social psychological research on the Fundamental Attribution Error, legal concepts such as intent, intentionality, mens rea, and scienter should be reexamined and reconstructed.

In Tellabs, the Supreme Court instructed federal courts to dismiss federal securities complaints, unless a reasonable person would deem the inference of scienter to be cogent, and at least as compelling as any opposite inference one could draw from factual allegations in the complaint. The Courts of Appeals are divided, however, on whether this framework applies at summary judgment.

When viewed from a social psychological perspective, Tellabs promotes effective judicial decision making. Tellabs broadens the epistemic goal of decision making to include consideration of both dispositional and situational factors. When federal courts explicitly consider alternative explanations and causes of the defendants’ actions, jurists are more likely to consider situational explanations and avoid the Fundamental Attribution Error, resulting in more accurate decisions. Tellabs, therefore, offsets the tendency to over-attribute fraudulent intent to conduct appearing unreasonable only in hindsight.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: Fundamental Attribution Error, Social Psychology, Scienter, Judicial Decision Making, Judging, Summary Judgment

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 27, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Quintanilla, Victor D., (Mis)Judging Intent: The Fundamental Attribution Error in Federal Securities Law (2010). NYU Journal of Business & Law, Vol. 7, pp. 195-246, 2010 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1865918

Contact Information

Victor David Quintanilla (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 375
Downloads: 62
Download Rank: 217,105
Footnotes:  211

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds