Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1866167
 
 

Footnotes (197)



 


 



Remoteness Re-Invented?


David McLauchlan


Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law

January 31, 2010

Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 3/2011

Abstract:     
This article discusses the fundamental questions concerning the application and conceptual basis of remoteness of damage in the law of contract that are raised by the decision of the House of Lords in The Achilleas [2009] 1 AC 61. It commences with a review of the academic literature that had a significant influence on their Lordships’ judgments in that case. While acknowledging the obvious theoretical difference between the two main schools of thought - one treating the remoteness rule as agreement-centred (with the task of the court being to identify an implicit allocation of risk) and the other treating it as a gap-filling device or default rule - the article questions whether the distinction has practical consequences. After a close analysis of each of the judgments in The Achilleas, which reveals, contrary to the view expressed in a recent English High Court case, a majority in favour of an agreement-centred approach, the article discusses, inter alia, the factors that ought to be weighed in determining whether a loss is too remote and the correctness of their Lordships’ unanimous decision to overturn the award of damages for lost profits that had been made by the, also unanimous, lower courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: contract, damages, remoteness

JEL Classification: K12

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 17, 2011 ; Last revised: July 3, 2012

Suggested Citation

McLauchlan, David, Remoteness Re-Invented? (January 31, 2010). Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 3/2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1866167 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1866167

Contact Information

David McLauchlan (Contact Author)
Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law ( email )
PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,236
Downloads: 436
Download Rank: 34,767
Footnotes:  197

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.468 seconds