An Empirical Assessment of Models of the Value Premium
University of Delaware
University of Minnesota
AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings Paper
Recent models of the value premium typically endogenously link B/M to firm-specific attributes. The value firms earn higher subsequent returns because these firms command a higher risk premium due to a higher default probability, lower profitability, higher operating leverage, shorter cash flow duration, or higher cash flow risk. We first sort the entire sample into several groups of firms with different levels of limits to arbitrage. We find that among the low limits-to-arbitrage groups in which the value premium is relatively small, there is indeed a significant desired relation between B/M and firm-specific attributes. In sharp contrast, among the high limits-to-arbitrage groups in which the value premium is the most pronounced, there is no significant desired relation between B/M and firm-specific attributes. These results are robust to exclusion of small stocks. Our findings suggest that risk may play a role in the value premium only among the low limits-to-arbitrage group, whereas mispricing plays a significant role among the high limits-to-arbitrage group. We also explore potential sources of mispricing for the value premium.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: value premium, mispricing, limits to arbitrage, financial distress, default risk, profitability, duration, cash flow risk, operating leverageworking papers series
Date posted: June 19, 2011 ; Last revised: January 14, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.109 seconds