The Deterrent Effects of SEC Enforcement and Class Action Litigation
Jared N. Jennings
Washington University in St. Louis
Rutgers Business School
Columbia Business School
The United States’ (U.S.) Congress specifically requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to deter potential miscreants via its enforcement actions against firms that engage in fraudulent financial reporting. The U.S. is also unique in allowing private enforcement against miscreants via class action lawsuits. In this paper, we investigate whether SEC enforcement actions and class action lawsuits, over the years 1996-2006, deter aggressive financial reporting behavior among the peers of fraudulent firms. We find significant deterrence associated with both SEC enforcement actions and class action lawsuits. The average peer firm, subject to SEC action or litigation, reduces discretionary accruals equivalent to 14% to 22% of the median return on assets (ROA) in the aftermath of such enforcement. The results also inform target selection criteria associated with greater deterrence. Moreover, repeated and sustained enforcement in an industry, as opposed to isolated investigations, provides more effective deterrence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Date posted: June 21, 2011 ; Last revised: April 30, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.218 seconds