Exploiting Form in Avoidance by International Tax Arbitrage – Arguments Towards a Unifying Hypothesis of Taxation Law
Victoria University of Wellington; Institut für Österreichisches und Internationales Steuerrecht, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien; Monash University
Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 8-14, January/February 2011
Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 11/2011
This article, which is based on the inaugral address given at the IBFD Tax Lecture Series in Beijing, China, examines the basic foundations and nature of income tax law before going on to offer a unifying theory of taxation law.
Income tax law is notoriously complex for a range of reasons. One is that tax law must address a huge and never-ending range of business transactions and structures. Another is that governments adulterate tax systems by using them to promote or to manage all sorts of economic and social programmes from mineral exploitation to birth control. Often we cannot tell whether a particular complexity is inherent in tax law or results from exogenous causes. The result is that we fail to see the fundamental causes of the complexity of tax law.
The author’s hypothesis is that since about 1960 there has been a steady move in countries’ appoach to tax law from normative to factual analysis. Often, this change reflects a move from form to substance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Keywords: income tax, tax reform, normative analysis, tax law, tax avoidance, international tax arbitrage, form and substance
JEL Classification: K33, K34Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 20, 2011 ; Last revised: August 26, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.516 seconds