Abstract

 


 



Why Should States Pay For Prisons, When Local Officials Decide Who Goes There?


W. David Ball


Santa Clara School of Law

June 23, 2011


Abstract:     
In the United States, states typically pay for prisons, even though the decisions that lead to prison admissions — arresting, charging, and sentencing — are made by local officials. The practice of state subsidies is relatively recent: there were no state prisons in the early part of the country’s history, and even as state institutions began to be developed, they largely supported themselves financially, rendering the notion of subsidies moot. Given the political economy of local decision-making, local preferences are unlikely to result in optimally-sized state prison populations. This Article suggests that since state prison subsidies may not be desirable and are certainly not inevitable, it may be time for states to reconsider paying for prisons.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: prison, sentencing, corrections, federalism, local government, crime, criminal law

JEL Classification: H1, H2, H3, H4, H7

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 27, 2011 ; Last revised: February 17, 2013

Suggested Citation

Ball, W. David, Why Should States Pay For Prisons, When Local Officials Decide Who Goes There? (June 23, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1871274 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1871274

Contact Information

W. David Ball (Contact Author)
Santa Clara School of Law ( email )
500 El Camino Real
Santa Clara, CA 95053
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 448
Downloads: 45

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.562 seconds