Why Should States Pay For Prisons, When Local Officials Decide Who Goes There?
W. David Ball
Santa Clara School of Law
June 23, 2011
In the United States, states typically pay for prisons, even though the decisions that lead to prison admissions — arresting, charging, and sentencing — are made by local officials. The practice of state subsidies is relatively recent: there were no state prisons in the early part of the country’s history, and even as state institutions began to be developed, they largely supported themselves financially, rendering the notion of subsidies moot. Given the political economy of local decision-making, local preferences are unlikely to result in optimally-sized state prison populations. This Article suggests that since state prison subsidies may not be desirable and are certainly not inevitable, it may be time for states to reconsider paying for prisons.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: prison, sentencing, corrections, federalism, local government, crime, criminal law
JEL Classification: H1, H2, H3, H4, H7working papers series
Date posted: June 27, 2011 ; Last revised: February 17, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.857 seconds