Why State Prisons?
W. David Ball
Santa Clara School of Law
Yale Law & Policy Review, Forthcoming
There is plenty of conversation about how to reduce state prison populations, but what almost no one talks about is this: states are under no obligation to provide prisons, nor are they obliged to pay for the costs associated with prison sentences. Perhaps this silence comes from an assumption that state governments have always paid for prison, but, as this Article reveals, this conventional wisdom is wrong. In fact, states neither built prisons nor paid for incarceration until the middle of the 19th century. The decisions of local officials drive prison admissions — via arresting, charging, and sentencing —but given the political economy of local decision-making, local preferences are unlikely to result in optimally-sized state prison populations. This Article suggests that since state prison subsidies may not be desirable and are certainly not inevitable, it may be time for states to reconsider paying for prisons.
(Previously Titled "Why Should States Pay for Prisons, When Local Officials Decide who Goes There?")
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: prison, sentencing, corrections, federalism, local government, crime, criminal law
JEL Classification: H1, H2, H3, H4, H7Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 27, 2011 ; Last revised: April 15, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.531 seconds