|
||||
|
||||
Intersubjective Meaning and Collective Action In 'Fragile' Societies: Theory, Evidence and Policy ImplicationsVarun GauriWorld Bank Michael WoolcockWorld Bank - Development Research Group; Harvard University - Kennedy School of Government Deval DesaiUniversity of London, School of Oriental & African Studies - School of Law June 1, 2011 World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5707 Abstract: The capacity to act collectively is not just a matter of groups sharing interests, incentives and values (or being sufficiently small), as standard economic theory predicts, but a prior and shared understanding of the constituent elements of problem(s) and possible solutions. From this standpoint, the failure to act collectively can stem at least in part from relevant groups failing to ascribe a common intersubjective meaning to situations, processes and events. Though this is a general phenomenon, it is particularly salient in countries characterized by societal fragility and endemic conflict. We develop a conceptual account of intersubjective meanings, explain its relevance to development practice and research, and examine its implications for development work related to building the rule of law and managing common pool resources.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 39 Keywords: Corporate Law, Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures, Cultural Policy, Labor Policies, Population Policies working papers seriesDate posted: June 25, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.359 seconds