Intersubjective Meaning and Collective Action In 'Fragile' Societies: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications
World Bank; World Bank - Development Research Group (DECRG)
World Bank - Development Research Group (DECRG); Harvard University - Kennedy School of Government
University of London, School of Oriental & African Studies - School of Law
June 1, 2011
World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5707
The capacity to act collectively is not just a matter of groups sharing interests, incentives and values (or being sufficiently small), as standard economic theory predicts, but a prior and shared understanding of the constituent elements of problem(s) and possible solutions. From this standpoint, the failure to act collectively can stem at least in part from relevant groups failing to ascribe a common intersubjective meaning to situations, processes and events. Though this is a general phenomenon, it is particularly salient in countries characterized by societal fragility and endemic conflict. We develop a conceptual account of intersubjective meanings, explain its relevance to development practice and research, and examine its implications for development work related to building the rule of law and managing common pool resources.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 39
Keywords: Corporate Law, Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures, Cultural Policy, Labor Policies, Population Policiesworking papers series
Date posted: June 25, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.250 seconds