Footnotes (381)



The Children of Baby M

J. Herbie DiFonzo

Hofstra University - School of Law

Ruth C. Stern



Capital University Law Review, Vol. 39, pp. 345-411, 2011
Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-22

Never the closest of bedfellows, law and technology mix uneasily within the realm of alternative reproductive practices. More than twenty years ago, the drama of Baby M provoked a fierce debate about the legal and biological contours of parenthood. In pondering the issue, the New Jersey Supreme Court attempted to erect a barrier between a natural mother’s right and what it saw as a dangerous and exploitive new mechanism for producing and marketing human life. Since that time, the practice of surrogacy and the use of alternative reproductive technologies have taken firm hold in our culture, creating families where, previously, none might have been possible.

This article examines the social and legal complexities involved in the apportioning of rights and responsibilities within these novel family forms. Biology was once determinative of parentage. Today, desire, intent, and the borrowing of another person’s reproductive capacities to create a child have forcefully intruded upon traditional notions of family. Baby M.’s children have been born into a world where law and technology must come to a rational, peaceable resolution in defining and preserving the bonds of parenthood.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 24, 2011 ; Last revised: September 20, 2011

Suggested Citation

DiFonzo, J. Herbie and Stern, Ruth C., The Children of Baby M (2011). Capital University Law Review, Vol. 39, pp. 345-411, 2011; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-22. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1871920

Contact Information

J. Herbie DiFonzo
Hofstra University - School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States

Hofstra University Logo

Ruth C. Stern (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 839
Downloads: 120
Download Rank: 176,086
Footnotes:  381

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds