Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1873555
 
 

Footnotes (250)



 


 



Improving Patent Notice and Remedies: A Critique of the FTC’s 2011 Report


Alan J. Devlin


Latham & Watkins

June 27, 2011

Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 18, p. 539

Abstract:     
In March 2011, the Federal Trade Commission released an eagerly awaited report on the U.S. patent system. The FTC advances a series of recommendations separately aimed at ameliorating the dire levels of notice imparted by most patents and correcting erroneous judicial practices that too-often accompany damages awards for infringement.

In this Article, the author explores the material features of the patent crisis and explains the crucial roles played by patent notice and remedies in fueling the same. The Article examines the Report’s probable efficacy, laudable provisions, and material shortcomings. The author concludes that, although its recommendations are generally well founded, the Report is unlikely to have a major impact on the patent system’s most significant problems. It thus appears likely that more significant reforms will be necessary.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 28, 2011 ; Last revised: May 9, 2012

Suggested Citation

Devlin, Alan J., Improving Patent Notice and Remedies: A Critique of the FTC’s 2011 Report (June 27, 2011). Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 18, p. 539. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1873555

Contact Information

Alan James Devlin (Contact Author)
Latham & Watkins ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 323
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 222,526
Footnotes:  250
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds