The New Multipolarity in Transnational Litigation: Foreign Courts, Foreign Judgments, and Foreign Law
Christopher A. Whytock
University of California, Irvine, School of Law
Marcus S. Quintanilla
affiliation not provided to SSRN
May 30, 2011
Southwestern Journal of International Law, Vol.18, 2011
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-29
Conventional wisdom suggests that the transnational litigation system is essentially unipolar, or perhaps bipolar, with the United States and the United Kingdom acting as the leading providers of courts and law for transnational disputes. Our overarching conjecture is that this unipolar (or bipolar) era – if it ever existed at all – has passed, and that transnational litigation is entering an era of ever increasing multipolarity. If this intuition is correct, then it will be increasingly important for U.S. judges and lawyers to be comfortable handling a wide range of conflict-of-laws problems, and prepared to consult closely with their colleagues abroad.
In this Article – based on our remarks at the International Law Weekend-West Conference held at Southwestern Law School in February 2011 – we develop three aspects of this conjecture, corresponding to three dimensions of the new multipolarity in transnational litigation. In Part I, we discuss the growing relative importance of non-U.S. forums for transnational litigation. In Part II, we highlight the potential proliferation of foreign judgments brought to the United States for recognition or enforcement. And in Part III, we consider the pervasiveness of foreign law issues that are likely to confront U.S. judges and lawyers, and the accompanying challenges of making determinations of foreign law in the wake of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Bodum USA, Inc. v. La Cafetière, Inc.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: Transnational Litigation, International Litigation, Litigation, Personal Jurisdiction, Forum Shopping, Foreign Judgments, Foreign Law, Conflict of Laws, Comparative Law, Rule 44.1
Date posted: June 29, 2011 ; Last revised: June 2, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds