Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1874894
 
 

Footnotes (105)



 


 



Measurement of Restitution: Coordinating Restitution with Compensatory Damages and Punitive Damages


Doug Rendleman


Washington and Lee University - School of Law

June 29, 2011

Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 68, 2011
Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-12

Abstract:     
Courts apply compensatory damages, restitution, and punitive damages to formulate litigants’ civil remedies. The frequently contested policy justifications for these three remedies are often hazy and uncertain. The transitions between the three remedies are disputed. Lawyers and courts often misunderstand restitution with deleterious consequences for litigants and the administration of justice.

The American Law Institute’s completion of the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment provides the legal profession with opportunities to dispel this haze and to clarify the distinctions. In addition to obviating defendants’ unjust enrichment, restitution with its measurement choices provides a midpoint on a continuum of the three remedies. Restitution’s policy justifications often overlap with compensatory damages at one end of the continuum and with punitive damages at the other.

This modest effort identifies wiser choices to aid lawyers’ and courts’ remedial decisions and seeks to improve the courts’ administration of litigants’ civil remedies. Focusing on the Restatement’s measurement choices for restitution, it explains familiar examples to analyze the choices between compensatory damages, restitution, and punitive damages and to locate the transitions between them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: Restitution, Punitive Damages, Compensatory Damages

JEL Classification: K00, K13, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 7, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Rendleman, Doug, Measurement of Restitution: Coordinating Restitution with Compensatory Damages and Punitive Damages (June 29, 2011). Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 68, 2011; Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1874894

Contact Information

Doug Rendleman (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University - School of Law ( email )
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,112
Downloads: 195
Download Rank: 93,544
Footnotes:  105

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds