Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1876376
 
 

Footnotes (16)



 


 



Cross Burning as Hate Speech Under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution


Wilson Ray Huhn


University of Akron - School of Law

2009

Amsterdam Law Forum, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Cross burning is a particularly vicious form of a hate speech. Some American states and cities have enacted laws prohibiting cross burning, and in two cases (R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) and Virginia v. Black (2003)) the United States Supreme Court has issued decisions regarding the constitutionality of those laws.These cases establish the principle that under the First Amendment hate speech is not punishable as a crime unless the speaker intended to threaten another person or the speaker intended to incite an imminent act of violence. Furthermore, the cases reinforce the principle that under the First Amendment a person may be convicted of a expressive crime only if the law under which the defendant was charged is narrowly drawn to prohibit only unprotected speech.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 1, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Huhn, Wilson Ray, Cross Burning as Hate Speech Under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (2009). Amsterdam Law Forum, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1876376

Contact Information

Wilson Ray Huhn (Contact Author)
University of Akron - School of Law ( email )
150 University Ave.
Akron, OH 44325-2901
United States
330-972-6791 (Phone)
330-258-2343 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 205
Downloads: 13
Footnotes:  16

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds