Cross Burning as Hate Speech Under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Wilson Ray Huhn
University of Akron - School of Law
Amsterdam Law Forum, Forthcoming
Cross burning is a particularly vicious form of a hate speech. Some American states and cities have enacted laws prohibiting cross burning, and in two cases (R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) and Virginia v. Black (2003)) the United States Supreme Court has issued decisions regarding the constitutionality of those laws.These cases establish the principle that under the First Amendment hate speech is not punishable as a crime unless the speaker intended to threaten another person or the speaker intended to incite an imminent act of violence. Furthermore, the cases reinforce the principle that under the First Amendment a person may be convicted of a expressive crime only if the law under which the defendant was charged is narrowly drawn to prohibit only unprotected speech.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Date posted: July 1, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.453 seconds