The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism
Kenneth M. Ehrenberg
State University of New York; University at Buffalo Law School, SUNY
July 1, 2011
Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 2011
I examine the impact of the presence of anarchists among key legal officials upon the legal positivist theories of H.L.A. Hart and Joseph Raz. For purposes of this paper, an anarchist is one who believes that the law cannot successfully obligate or create reasons for action beyond prudential reasons, such as avoiding sanction. I show that both versions of positivism require key legal officials to endorse the law in some way, and that if a legal system can continue to exist and function when its key officials reject the reason-giving character of law, then we have a reason to re-examine and amend legal positivism.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: Philosophical anarchism, Political obligation, General jurisprudence, H.L.A. Hart, Legal positivism, Internal point of view, Rule of recognition, Joseph RazAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 3, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.141 seconds