|
||||
|
||||
Advertising Effects in Presidential ElectionsBrett R. GordonColumbia Business School Wesley R. HartmannStanford University - Graduate School of Business August 21, 2012 Stanford Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 2080 Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 12/33 Abstract: Presidential elections provide both an important context in which to study advertising and a setting that mitigates the challenges of dynamics and endogeneity. We use the 2000 and 2004 general elections to analyze the effect of market-level advertising on county-level vote shares. The results indicate significant positive effects of advertising exposures. Both instrumental variables and fixed effects alter the ad coefficient. Advertising elasticities are smaller than are typical for branded goods, yet significant enough to shift election outcomes. For example, if advertising were set to zero and all other factors held constant, three states' electoral votes would have changed parties in 2000. Given the narrow margin of victory in 2000, this shift would have resulted in a different president.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41 Keywords: advertising, politics, instrumental variables, presidential elections Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 9, 2011 ; Last revised: August 25, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.922 seconds