Random, Suspicionless Searches of Students’ Belongings: A Legal, Empirical, and Normative Analysis
Jason P. Nance
University of Florida Levin College of Law
July 7, 2011
84 University of Colorado Law Review 367 (2013)
This Article provides a legal, empirical, and normative analysis of an intrusive search practice used by schools officials to prevent school crime: random, suspicionless searches of students’ belongings. First, it argues that these searches are not permitted under the Fourth Amendment unless schools have particularized evidence of a substance abuse or weapons problem. Second, it provides a normative evaluation of strict security measures in schools, especially when they are applied disproportionately to minority students. Third, drawing on recent restricted data from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Survey on Crime and Safety, this Article provides empirical findings that raise concerns that some public schools may be conducting unconstitutional searches of students’ belongings. In addition, it shows that these potentially unconstitutional searches are more likely to take place in schools with higher minority populations than in schools with lower minority populations, even after taking into account school officials' perceptions of the levels of crime where students live and where the school is located. Finally, this Article argues that the Supreme Court should resolve any ambiguity in its jurisprudence by expressly requiring school officials to have particularized, objective evidence of a substance abuse or weapons problem before permitting schools to perform these intrusive searches.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 65
Keywords: Education Law, Civil Rights, Fourth Amendment, Constitutional Law, School Law, Public Schools, Search and Seizure, Suspicionless Searches
JEL Classification: I28, K30Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 9, 2011 ; Last revised: November 20, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds