Abstract

 
 

References (52)



 


 



The Limitations of Economic Counterfactuals: The Case of the Lancashire Textile Industry


Steve Toms


University of Leeds - Leeds University Business School (LUBS)

Matthias Beck


Queen's University Management School

2007

Management & Organizational History, Vol. 2, p. 315, 2007

Abstract:     
The article presents a history of the Lancashire cotton textile industry from the perspective of decision-making entrepreneurs as embedded historical actors, in contradistinction to the economics-based counterfactuals that dominate the recent historiography of the industry.A simulation approach is used to recreate the decision- making parameters faced by entrepreneurs and is used to support a genealogical path-dependent interpretation to overcome the problems of teleology and hindsight. Using historical evidence and evidence from the simulation, a critique of three economics-based counterfactuals is developed. These are the Lazonick counterfactual, the Keynesian counterfactual and the neo-classical counterfactual. It is shown that none of these take into account the full context of the decisions that were taken and none therefore offer a convincing explanation of the collapse of the industry.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: entrepreneurs, history simulation, Lancashire cotton textiles

JEL Classification: D84, L67, N14, N23, N64

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 9, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Toms, Steve and Beck, Matthias, The Limitations of Economic Counterfactuals: The Case of the Lancashire Textile Industry (2007). Management & Organizational History, Vol. 2, p. 315, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1881793

Contact Information

Steve Toms (Contact Author)
University of Leeds - Leeds University Business School (LUBS) ( email )
Leeds LS2 9JT
United Kingdom
Matthias Beck
Queen's University Management School ( email )
Belfast, Northern Ireland BT7 1NN
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 172
Downloads: 13
References:  52

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds