Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1883272
 
 

Footnotes (4)



 


 



Interpreting the Constitution: Indian Supreme Court Constitution Benches Since Independence


Nick Robinson


Harvard Law School, Program on the Legal Profession; Center for Policy Research (India)

Anjana Agarwal


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Vrinda Bhandari


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Ankit Goel


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Karishma Kakkar


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Reeba Muthalaly


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Vivek Shivakumar


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Meera Sreekumar


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Surya Sreenivasan


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Shruti Viswanathan


affiliation not provided to SSRN

February 26, 2011

Economic & Political Weekly, Vol XLVI, No. 9, February 26, 2011

Abstract:     
Constitution benches have been vital to the Indian Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. However, the number of these benches has fallen since the 1960s leading to a reshaping of how the Court has interpreted the Indian Constitution. This article examines all constitution benches from independence until the end of 2009 (1,532 cases). We find that even as constitution benches have become less frequent, their judgments have become longer, more prone to split decisions, increasingly delayed, and more likely to have been brought under both appellate and writ jurisdictions. In fact, given the more convoluted nature of these decisions in recent years, it has become increasingly difficult to even determine the winning party. That said, appellants/petitioners now do better than respondents before constitution benches, while the government continues to do disproportionately well and companies have significantly improved their records. The Court is relatively open to citing foreign judgments, although it cited them most frequently in the decade after independence. Meanwhile, the chief justice plays a dominant role in not only choosing when constitution benches are heard, but also which judges will hear the case. Using this analysis, which paints a far more textured picture of these benches than has previously been available, we make a set of recommendations to help strengthen the Supreme Court’s constitution benches.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Indian Supreme Court, Constitution, Supreme Court Judges, Constitution Benches, Constitutional Jurisprudence, Quantitative Analysis, Supreme Court Caseload

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 12, 2011 ; Last revised: September 23, 2012

Suggested Citation

Robinson, Nick and Agarwal, Anjana and Bhandari, Vrinda and Goel, Ankit and Kakkar, Karishma and Muthalaly, Reeba and Shivakumar, Vivek and Sreekumar, Meera and Sreenivasan, Surya and Viswanathan, Shruti, Interpreting the Constitution: Indian Supreme Court Constitution Benches Since Independence (February 26, 2011). Economic & Political Weekly, Vol XLVI, No. 9, February 26, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1883272

Contact Information

Nick Robinson (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School, Program on the Legal Profession ( email )
1563 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Center for Policy Research (India) ( email )
Dharma Marg
Chanakyapuri
New Delhi, 110022
India
Anjana Agarwal
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Vrinda Bhandari
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Ankit Goel
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Karishma Kakkar
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Reeba Muthalaly
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Vivek Shivakumar
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Meera Sreekumar
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Surya Sreenivasan
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Shruti Viswanathan
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,292
Downloads: 290
Download Rank: 60,404
Footnotes:  4

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds