Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games
11 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2011
Date Written: 1996
Abstract
We conduct double-anonymous dictator experiments to explore the role of altruism in motivating subjects’ behavior. We vary the extent to which an anonymous recipient is deserving of aid and investigate its effect on the allocation of a fixed pie by student subjects. This is accomplished by including as treatments: (1) an anonymous student subject and (2) an established charity. We find that a significant increase in donations occurs when we increase the extent to which a donation goes to a recipient generally agreed to be “deserving.” We conclude that subjects are rational in the way they incorporate fairness into their decisions.
JEL Classification: A13, C91, D64
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Are Women Less Selfish than Men?: Evidence from Dictator Games
-
Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence
-
The Relative Price of Fairness: Gender Differences in a Punishment Game
-
When are Women More Generous than Men?
By James C. Cox and Cary A. Deck
-
An Experimental Test of the Crowding Out Hypothesis
By Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman, ...
-
By Susan Laury and Laura O. Taylor
-
Discrimination and Nepotism: The Efficiency of the Anonymity Rule
By Chaim Fershtman, Uri Gneezy, ...