Abstract

 
 

Citations (23)



 


 



The Relative Price of Fairness: Gender Differences in a Punishment Game


Catherine C. Eckel


Texas A&M University

Philip J. Grossman


Monash University

August 1, 1996

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 30, No. 2, p. 143, 1996

Abstract:     
Ideas of fairness influence economic transactions. Men and women may differ systematically in the nature and extent of this influence. We investigate gender differences in the impact of fairness on the outcome of economic transactions. In our “punishment game” subjects may choose to split a larger pie with a “bad” partner, or a smaller pie with a “good” partner. We find that a higher relative price for fairness reduces its effect on the outcome of the transaction for women, but not for men. Our interpretation of this result is that men are more likely than women to make decisions on principle.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: Fairness, Gender, Dictator game

JEL Classification: C91, A13

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 11, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Eckel, Catherine C. and Grossman, Philip J., The Relative Price of Fairness: Gender Differences in a Punishment Game (August 1, 1996). Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 30, No. 2, p. 143, 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1883605

Contact Information

Catherine C. Eckel (Contact Author)
Texas A&M University ( email )
5201 University Blvd.
College Station, TX 77843-4228
United States
Philip J. Grossman
Monash University ( email )
wellington road
Clayton, victoria 3800
Australia
+61399020052 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 219
Downloads: 36
Citations:  23

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.625 seconds