Citizens United and the Roberts Court’s War on Democracy
Gene R. Nichol Jr.
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law
Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 27, 2011
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1883862
This article, published as part of the Georgia State Law Review symposium on the much-noted Citizens United case, argues enthusiastically that the Roberts Court’s bold recognition of a constitutional right to corporate electioneering is unjustified by the text, history, purpose or traditions of the First Amendment. The ruling radically and illicitly trumps democratic processes to favor the political interests of the already economically privileged. It purposely renders all campaign finance regulation silly and useless. It says, further, that there is something about our Constitution that renders us flatly powerless to deal with the scourge of purchased politics. This cannot be so. It is dangerous and demeaning to the world’s strongest democracy to suggest otherwise.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 12, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.704 seconds