Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1884241
 
 

Footnotes (27)



 


 



A Winn for Educational Pluralism


Nicole Stelle Garnett


Notre Dame Law School

May 25, 2011

Yale Law Journal Online, May 2011
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 11-25

Abstract:     
This short essay takes as its starting point on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Winn v. Arizona Christian Tuition Organization, which involved an Establishment Clause challenge to Arizona’s scholarship tax program — a school-choice device that provides tax credits from state income taxes for donations to organizations granting scholarship to private K-12 schools. In Winn, a divided court ruled that taxpayers lack standing to challenge this and other tax credit programs — thereby dramatically limiting the Flast v. Cohen exception to the no-taxpayer-standing rule. The essay makes the case that the Winn will promote authentic educational pluralism by clearing the constitutional path for further expansion of scholarship tax credit programs, which enhance the educational opportunities available for students of modest means.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: Winn, Flast, taxpayer standing, Establishment Clause, school choice, tax credits

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 14, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Garnett, Nicole Stelle, A Winn for Educational Pluralism (May 25, 2011). Yale Law Journal Online, May 2011; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 11-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1884241

Contact Information

Nicole Stelle Garnett (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556
United States
574-631-3091 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.nd.edu/faculty/facultypages/garnettn.html
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 392
Downloads: 45
Footnotes:  27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds