Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1886575
 
 

Footnotes (273)



 


 



The Judicial Role in Trademark Law


Michael Grynberg


DePaul University - College of Law

July 15, 2011

Boston College Law Review, Vol. 52, p. 1283, 2011

Abstract:     
This article considers the judicial role in developing trademark law. The issue is important because proposals for trademark reform often rest on expansive conceptions of judicial authority. In thinking about trademark reform, we should broaden our perspective to include considerations of what we want from the law in general. Our answer to the question of what judges applying the Lanham Act should do may vary depending on whether we respond as subjects of trademark law (i.e., as consumers or sellers), as litigants to a trademark action, or as third parties whose focus is not on trademark law, but the general operation of the legal system. Thinking about contested trademark policies in this manner provides an alternative basis for explaining, critiquing, and reforming modern doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: Trademark, Intellectual Property

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 16, 2011 ; Last revised: September 24, 2011

Suggested Citation

Grynberg, Michael, The Judicial Role in Trademark Law (July 15, 2011). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 52, p. 1283, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1886575

Contact Information

Michael Grynberg (Contact Author)
DePaul University - College of Law ( email )
25 E. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL Cook County 60604-2287
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 398
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 223,692
Footnotes:  273

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.329 seconds