Footnotes (3)



Towards Attenuation: A ‘New’ Due Process Limit on Pinkerton Conspiracy Liability

Mark L. Noferi

American Immigration Council

March 1, 2006

33 Am. J. Crim. L. 91 (2006)

Since 1946, Pinkerton v. United States has purportedly settled the rule that a conspirator can be held vicariously liable for the crimes of his co-conspirators. Over the last thirty years, however, courts have begun to articulate and enforce Due Process limits on vicarious conspiracy liability where defendants are “attenuated” from their co-conspirator’s crimes. This article represents the first academic examination of constitutional Due Process limits on Pinkerton conspiracy liability, their theoretical underpinnings, and the implications as the federal government pursues terrorism and corporate conspiracy prosecutions.

In Part I of this Article, I outline the rationale behind vicarious conspiracy liability, examining Pinkerton and the common-law and theoretical justifications it rests upon. In Part II, I examine the Pinkerton Court’s suggested limit of “reasonable foreseeability,” and the dissent’s critique that “reasonable foreseeability” is inadequate to protect due process, providing the touchstone for the later reassessments. In Part III, I examine the dissent’s three concerns – looser evidentiary standards, the potentially unlimited scope of vicarious liability, and guilt by association – and their relationship to the Due Process Clause. Part IV examines the lower court reassessments of Due Process limits on Pinkerton liability. In Part V, I articulate this “new due process limit” of “attenuation,” examine its theoretical justifications, and consider its practical implications, as well as whether the Supreme Court might adopt such a standard.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: Pinkerton, conspiracy, criminal law, due process, vicarious liability, accomplice liability, complicity, attenuation, causation, foreseeability, terrorism, corporate law, guilt by association

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 16, 2011 ; Last revised: May 16, 2015

Suggested Citation

Noferi, Mark L., Towards Attenuation: A ‘New’ Due Process Limit on Pinkerton Conspiracy Liability (March 1, 2006). 33 Am. J. Crim. L. 91 (2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1886581

Contact Information

Mark L. Noferi (Contact Author)
American Immigration Council ( email )
1331 G St. NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
United States
2025077533 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://immigrationpolicy.org/ipc-staff
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 397
Downloads: 71
Download Rank: 221,741
Footnotes:  3

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds