Footnotes (215)



Does Five Equal Three? Reading the Takings Clause In Light of the Third Amendment's Protection of Houses

Thomas G. Sprankling

Columbia University - Law Review

January 19, 2012

Columbia Law Review, Vol. 112, p. 112, 2012

The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Kelo v. City of New London broke new ground by holding that the seizure of owner-occupied homes as part of a plan to foster economic development was a taking for “public use” under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Kelo’s many critics have yet to advance a constitutionally-grounded rationale for why homes should receive special protection from condemnation. This Note argues that the Third Amendment’s solicitude for the home provides a constitutional basis for distinguishing between homes and the other forms of “private property” covered by the Takings Clause. The Amendment, which provides that “[n]o soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law,” shares both historical and textual links with the Clause. These connections suggest the judiciary should apply a form of heightened scrutiny similar to the “meaningful” review standard proposed by Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in Kelo when determining whether the government’s seizure of an owner-occupied home is for “public use.”

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: Third Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Takings Clause, Public Use, Kelo, Home, House, Intratextualism

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 18, 2011 ; Last revised: January 19, 2012

Suggested Citation

Sprankling, Thomas G., Does Five Equal Three? Reading the Takings Clause In Light of the Third Amendment's Protection of Houses (January 19, 2012). Columbia Law Review, Vol. 112, p. 112, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1887204

Contact Information

Thomas G. Sprankling (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law Review ( email )
435 W. 116 Street
New York, NY 10027
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 993
Downloads: 39
Footnotes:  215

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds