Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1887888
 
 

Footnotes (279)



 
 

Comments (1)

Last comment: July 20, 2011

 


 



An Empirical Analysis of Fair Use Decisions under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy


David A. Simon


Harvard Law School; University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

July 17, 2011

Boston College Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
For over ten years, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has resolved nearly 20,000 domain-name disputes under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) - a mandatory arbitration policy implemented by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The UDRP allows the holder of a legally protectable trademark to initiate proceedings to cancel the domain name or have it transferred to the trademark owner. Domain-name holders, though, have a number of defenses, including using their domain names in a noncommercial, fair manner. Although several empirical studies have analyzed various aspects of the UDRP, none has specifically examined this fair use defense.

This study does what others have not. It analyzes the fair use defense in decisions before WIPO. Using WIPO’s online decision database, this study made two important findings. First, respondents from the United States are more likely than those from other countries to succeed on a fair use defense. Second, arbitrators from the United States are more likely than those from other countries to find that a respondent’s use of a domain name was fair. This means that, under the UDRP, respondents from the United States enjoy greater speech protections than those from other countries, and that arbitrators from the United States are more sympathetic to speech interests than arbitrators from other countries. To improve the UDRP, I propose two revisions. First, ICANN should adopt a choice of law provision stating that the law of the respondent’s home country governs fair use disputes. Second, ICANN should implement a panel assignment provision in fair use cases that requires arbitrators to share the nationalities of the litigants.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 19, 2011 ; Last revised: January 28, 2012

Suggested Citation

Simon, David A., An Empirical Analysis of Fair Use Decisions under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (July 17, 2011). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1887888

Contact Information

David A. Simon (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )
10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,123
Downloads: 478
Download Rank: 32,915
Footnotes:  279

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.641 seconds