Footnotes (212)



Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author

Annemarie Bridy

University of Idaho College of Law

July 18, 2011

Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 5, pp. 1-28 (Spring 2012).
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-25

For more than a quarter century, interest among copyright scholars in the question of AI authorship has waxed and waned as the popular conversation about AI has oscillated between exaggerated predictions for its future and premature pronouncements of its death. For policymakers, the issue has sat on the horizon, always within view but never actually pressing. To recognize this fact, however, is not to say that we can or should ignore the challenge that AI authorship presents to copyright law’s underlying assumptions about creativity. On the contrary, the relatively slow development of AI offers a reprieve from the reactive, crisis-driven model of policymaking that has dominated copyright law in the digital era.

By engaging and extending insights from two relatively discrete lines of existing scholarship - the postmodern critique of romantic authorship and the more pragmatic literature on copyright in works produced with the aid of computers - this Article seeks to answer the vexing copyright questions that arise from the artificially intelligent production of cultural works. It does so by developing the argument that all creativity is inherently algorithmic and that works produced autonomously by computers are therefore less heterogeneous to both their human counterparts and the current structure of copyright law than appearances may at first suggest.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: copyright, artificial intelligence, AI, creativity, authorship, author, work made for hire, computer generated, procedural content generation, generative art, Oulipo, psychography, Feist, originality

JEL Classification: K11, K30, K39, O30, O31, O32, O33, O34, O35

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: July 19, 2011 ; Last revised: April 15, 2014

Suggested Citation

Bridy, Annemarie, Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author (July 18, 2011). Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 5, pp. 1-28 (Spring 2012).; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1888622

Contact Information

Annemarie Bridy (Contact Author)
University of Idaho College of Law ( email )
875 Perimeter Dr.
MS 2321
Moscow, ID 83844-2321
United States
(208) 885-7056 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.uidaho.edu/law/faculty/annemariebridy
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,835
Downloads: 236
Download Rank: 78,035
Footnotes:  212
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds