|
||||
|
||||
Anthropology as Critical Legal Intervention? Instrumentalization, Co-Construction and Critical Reformulation in the Relationship between Anthropology and International LawEddie Bruce-JonesUniversity of London, Birkbeck College School of Law; King's College London School of Law; Humboldt University of Berlin 2009 UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2009 Abstract: This article creates a way to imagine the relationship between law and anthropology. It describes an analytical separation between three overlapping and interacting branches, aiming to present the relationship in a way that is instructive and programmatic. This article first highlights relevant methods and epistemologies of law and anthropology. Then it explores three central branches of anthropological-legal interaction, framed respectively as instrumentalization, co-construction, and critical reformulation. Ultimately, the article posits that the tensions between anthropology and law, including the (mis)appropriation of anthropology by law, can be theorized and repositioned as a means of more critically understanding how power and culturally-informed perspectives coordinate the production of legal knowledge. .
Keywords: International law, anthropology, production of knowledge JEL Classification: K33 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 20, 2011Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds