Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1890676
 


 



Not Out of the (Fox)Woods Yet: Indian Gaming and the Bankruptcy Code


Emir Crowne


University of Windsor - Faculty of Law

Andrew Black


affiliation not provided to SSRN

S. Alex Constantin


affiliation not provided to SSRN

May 20, 2011

University of Nevada Las Vegas Gaming Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 25, Spring 2011

Abstract:     
Does tribunal sovereignty trump federal bankruptcy law? This is the basic question we explore in this article. We will argue that where a tribal corporate entity voluntarily enters into a business contract with non-tribal investors, it must be made subject not only to the relevant rules and regulations, but also to the terms of the agreements it undertakes. Being commercially participatory entails being commercially responsible. It means paying liabilities where and as they become due in accordance with law and the principles of equity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: tribal, native, Indian, indigenous, aboriginal, gaming, gambling, bankruptcy, sovereignty

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 21, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Crowne, Emir and Black, Andrew and Constantin, S. Alex, Not Out of the (Fox)Woods Yet: Indian Gaming and the Bankruptcy Code (May 20, 2011). University of Nevada Las Vegas Gaming Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 25, Spring 2011 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1890676

Contact Information

Emir Crowne (Contact Author)
University of Windsor - Faculty of Law ( email )
401 Sunset Avenue
Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4
Canada
HOME PAGE: http://www.uwindsor.ca/emir/
Andrew Black
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Serban Alex Constantin
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 782
Downloads: 98
Download Rank: 165,006

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds