|
||||
|
||||
Not Out of the (Fox)Woods Yet: Indian Gaming and the Bankruptcy CodeEmir CrowneUniversity of Windsor - Faculty of Law Andrew Blackaffiliation not provided to SSRN S. Alex Constantinaffiliation not provided to SSRN May 20, 2011 University of Nevada Las Vegas Gaming Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 25, Spring 2011 Abstract: Does tribunal sovereignty trump federal bankruptcy law? This is the basic question we explore in this article. We will argue that where a tribal corporate entity voluntarily enters into a business contract with non-tribal investors, it must be made subject not only to the relevant rules and regulations, but also to the terms of the agreements it undertakes. Being commercially participatory entails being commercially responsible. It means paying liabilities where and as they become due in accordance with law and the principles of equity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24 Keywords: tribal, native, Indian, indigenous, aboriginal, gaming, gambling, bankruptcy, sovereignty Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 21, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.125 seconds