|
||||
|
||||
Response: There is a Case for CongressLawrence FriedmanNew England Law | Boston Victor HansenNew England Law | Boston July 20, 2011 New England Law Review, Vol. 46, 2011 Abstract: In her thoughtful review of our book, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, Elizabeth Wilson argues that our belief that Congress can play a critical role in directing post-September 11 national-security policy is misguided. She questions what she calls our “pleasing but perhaps ultimately naïve faith in rational discourse.” She does not believe rational discourse will “get at the root causes of the illness that paralyzes Congress because those root causes are, at bottom, political.” In this brief response, we suggest that there are circumstances in which Congress can overcome politics and act to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities, both within and without the national security context.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 4 Keywords: separation of powers, war on terror, national security, Congress Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 22, 2011Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.438 seconds