Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1891564
 


 



The Pragmatic Court: Reinterpreting the Supreme People’s Court of China


Taisu Zhang


Duke University - School of Law; Yale University

July 20, 2011

Columbia Journal of Asian Law, Volume 25, pp. 1-61

Abstract:     
This paper examines the institutional motivations that underlie several major developments in the Supreme People’s Court of China’s recent policy-making. Since 2007, the Court has sent off a collection of policy signals that escapes sweeping ideological labeling: It has publicly embraced a populist view of legal reform, encouraging the use of mediation in dispute resolution and popular participation in judicial policy-making, but continues to advocate legal professionalization as a long-term policy objective. It has also eagerly attempted to enhance its own institutional competence by promoting judicial efficiency, simplifying key areas of civil law, and expanding its control over lower court adjudication. This paper argues that the strongest institutional motivation underlying this complex pattern of activity is, contrary to some common assumptions, neither simple obedience to the Party leadership nor internalized belief in some legal reform ideology, whether legal professionalism or populism. Instead, it is the pragmatic strengthening of the Court’s own financial security and sociopolitical status – the Court is, in many ways, a “rational actor” that pursues its institutional self-interest. This theory of “institutional pragmatism” brings unique analytical cohesion to the Court’s recent behavior, giving us a clearer sense of its current priorities and, perhaps, its future outlook.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: Supreme People's Court of China, Chinese Judiciary, Institutional Motivations, Rational Actor, Populism, Professionalism, Judicial Efficiency

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 22, 2011 ; Last revised: June 20, 2012

Suggested Citation

Zhang, Taisu, The Pragmatic Court: Reinterpreting the Supreme People’s Court of China (July 20, 2011). Columbia Journal of Asian Law, Volume 25, pp. 1-61. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1891564

Contact Information

Taisu Zhang (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Yale University ( email )
New Haven, CT 06520
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,636
Downloads: 453
Download Rank: 34,513

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds