Stuxnet as Cyberwarfare: Applying the Law of War to the Virtual Battlefield

38 Pages Posted: 22 Jul 2011

Date Written: July 22, 2011

Abstract

In the field of international humanitarian law, there are a number of questions about the conduct of warfare in the cyber domain. In some cases, answers can be gleaned from treaties and customary international law but in other instances, solutions are seemingly intractable, begging for solutions that may only be answered by technology itself. From a legal perspective, such oversimplifications trivialize humanitarian law as well as other legal constructs already struggling to address complex issues in the cyber realm.

It is within this context that this paper focuses on a recent event known as Stuxnet, a computer virus that infected and damaged a nuclear research facility in Natanz, Iran. Reflecting on this particular cyber attack, this paper addresses two IHL issues: Does the Stuxnet attack rise to the level of an armed attack within the meaning of international humanitarian law? If so, did it adhere to the two core principles of IHL, namely distinction and proportionality? This paper finds that the Stuxnet attack does in fact rise to the level of an armed attack within the meaning of IHL and adheres to the principles of distinction and proportionality.

Keywords: Stuxnet, cyberwar, cyberwarfare, law of war, IHL, humanitarian law, virus, Iran, Natanz, proportionality, distinction

Suggested Citation

Richardson, John Charles, Stuxnet as Cyberwarfare: Applying the Law of War to the Virtual Battlefield (July 22, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1892888 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1892888

John Charles Richardson (Contact Author)

JMR Portfolio Intelligence ( email )

United States

HOME PAGE: http://jmrportfolio.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,923
Abstract Views
7,810
Rank
15,789
PlumX Metrics