|
||||
|
||||
The Constitutional Prohibition on Religious TestsLuke BeckUniversity of Sydney - Faculty of Law July 1, 2011 Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 323-352, 2011 Abstract: Section 116 of the Australian Constitution sets out four important guarantees of religious freedom. The fourth clause of that section provides that ‘no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth’. During the Convention Debates, the religious tests clause was described as being the least necessary clause of s 116 on the basis that there were no remaining religious tests in the Australian colonies and that it was outlandish to think that the Commonwealth would ever impose one. This paper seeks to explore the meaning of the religious tests clause and refute those two suggestions. It seeks to show that at the time of Federation religious tests remained in the Australian colonies. It also seeks to show that the Commonwealth today, albeit unconstitutionally, requires the satisfaction of religious tests for certain public positions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30 Keywords: religious test, religious tests clause, Test Act, Corporations Act, oath, affirmation, Roman Catholic Relief Act, clergy disqualification, section 116, article VI clause 3, public trust, office or public trust under the Commonwealth, office or public trust under the United States Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 23, 2011 ; Last revised: March 26, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.703 seconds