Footnotes (69)



Civil Recourse and Separation of Wrongs and Remedies

Arthur Ripstein

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

July 1, 2011

Florida State University Law Review, Forthcoming

In developing their Civil Recourse theory of tort law, John Goldberg and Benjamin Zipursky seek to separate Civil Recourse from Corrective Justice by showing that tort law does not work in the ways in which corrective justice theory says that it must. The strategy of separation, in turn, rests on a separation between wrongs and remedies, a separation between ideas of risk and ideas of ordinariness, a separation between abstract characterizations of rights and contingent social norms, and, finally, a separation between a wrong done against the plaintiff and her power to exact a remedy. I argue that none of these separations can be made.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Civil Recourse theory, tort law, Corrective Justice

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 24, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Ripstein, Arthur, Civil Recourse and Separation of Wrongs and Remedies (July 1, 2011). Florida State University Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1893588 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1893588

Contact Information

Arthur Ripstein (Contact Author)
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )
78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
(416) 978-0735 (Phone)
(416) 978-2648 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 869
Downloads: 199
Download Rank: 113,278
Footnotes:  69

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds